We need more marshals, click here if you want to get involved.
You are not logged in.
fzrgray wrote:
it could be if the baffle as collapsed it could be blocking the exhaust try taking the baffle out
Progress report: I've replaced the silencers. Lovely pair. Of reverse-cone megas in the Dunstall pattern. As I took the old ones off they rattled alarmingly, and when I looked through, I could see daylight - a perfect circle of it! On tipping them up with the flared end up, what was left of the 'baffles' fell out! They consisted of a couple of little tubes with a cut and a dent in each, and they were just rattling around loose in there! It now sounds even more Triumph-esque - beautifully fruity and not too loud or too quiet - just right! Soon it will be MOT'd, soon...
Offline
Offline
Is that an SR500?
Offline
No idea Hic, just looks nice.... and is fitted with Dunstall type zorts.....
Offline
You asked me ages ago to post a pic or two of the 650. So here's one to be going on with...
Last edited by Hic! Mine's a triple (08-10-2008 11:22:19)
Offline
... And another...
Last edited by Hic! Mine's a triple (08-10-2008 10:37:59)
Offline
And another...
Note the old 'silencer' on this one.
Last edited by Hic! Mine's a triple (08-10-2008 11:24:53)
Offline
And finally...
Slim ol' thing, innit? These in the pics are the new bars - the old ones were the original Yamaha pullbacks. Horrible things - totally wrong wrist angle. More like the tiller on a boat, but there were two of 'em. It was like pushing a wheelbarrow! I have long arms so my elbows were at 90 degrees. Hanging on at anything over 60mph pumped up my biceps like Arnie's and felt like the grips were going to slide off the bars - not nice. So 7 inch rise non-pullback bars were acquired from K2. Much better.
Last edited by Hic! Mine's a triple (08-10-2008 11:39:34)
Offline
Looks very nice Hic, is it by any chance an American model?
Offline
It is indeed. Came with a totally trashed US spec speedo which went up to 85mph with a 'redline' at 55 and didn't work anyway. So I got myself a 100mph one from an XS250SE. Which doesn't work properly. So I'm watching a set of UK model XS650 clocks on ebay. I'll get there in the end. I'll need a UK spec speedo drive, obviously, otherwise it'll be reading about 120mph at a true 70!
Last edited by Hic! Mine's a triple (08-10-2008 11:43:27)
Offline
I was thinking when you mentioned the bike after you posted about it that these larger XS's were very similar in styling & looks to the more modern day SR125 & that was perhaps a factor in the SR's design that was probably inspired by these old classics. Looking at those pics i can see definate resemblences.
Offline
Seems likely - the XS650SE or Special was the first of the Japanese 'US custom' types. After that, there was the Kawasaki Z650SR, which was a rather wishy-washy attempt, notable mainly for its interesting crossover header pipes. Also of note were; the XS750SE, a triple (Yay!), the 850 version, also known as a 'Midnight Special' in the States, the same name on a rather tasty looking black and gold XS1100 (The XS1.1 Midnight Special. Mmmmmm!), the 250 and 400 XS-SEs and, yes, the SR125. Kawasaki got their act together with their big 'LTD' zeds and Suzuki came good with the GS550L, after a rather weak version of the GSX250 which gained higher handlebars, wire wheels and half-hearted custom styling while it lost the 'X' and most of its appeal. Honda decided to be a bit different with the CB650 'Nighthawk', then followed the crowd with their CM250, a customed-up superdream, and the CX500C, which probably shouldn't be mentioned in polite society. Later on, along came the V-twins, starting with the Yam XV750, then the Virago series and leading eventually to the Japanese Harley and Indian clones we have today. But the XS650SE was the first. Japanese factory custom, that is. Triumph had been turning out the rather nice US spec Bonnie for years, which was probably Yamaha's inspiration for the XS, and Guzzi had their California, of course. My 650, being a US import, has the even smaller US spec tank, which does look nice, but one wonders how practical it'd be given the distances that can be involved in riding in the US! Oh dear, it looks like I'm turning into a bit of an anorak, doesn't it? I have no idea why I've retained all this useless information!
Last edited by Hic! Mine's a triple (09-10-2008 14:29:27)
Offline
Hic! Mine's a triple wrote:
Suzuki came good with the GS550L, after a rather weak version of the GSX250 which gained higher handlebars, wire wheels and half-hearted custom styling while it lost the 'X' and most of its appeal.
I was always lead to believe the GSX250 (we are of course talking late 70's versions) was simply a 4-stroke variation of the GT250, which of course was a 2-smoke twin which of course had the more sporty vcariation of itself which was the X7 (i've owned a couple of them) & many features from the X7 (such as the star pattern wheels) & other bits from the original GT250, went into the GSX250E, which was also hailed as a baby version of the GS850 of the time (if memory serves me right the GS850G) - minus the shaft drive of course!
Offline
The GSX250 was a late entry to the 4-stroke 250 market, and was one of the better ones to boot. It wasn't too heavy, it had a good, quick (for a 4-stroke) engine, which was smooth and made a nice snarly noise. The handling was good, if a bit bouncy (usual Suzuki - oversprung, underdamped), and it looked pretty good, with its big DOHC TSCC engine. The seat was a bit of a problem though - it was too soft and thin, so after an hour or so you ended up sitting on the hard base. The GS250 was the same basic bike, but with a smaller tank, wire spoked wheels, no plastic tailpiece, different sidepanels and higher bars. It was, in effect, a budget version, but they'd had a half-hearted go at kidding on it was a 'custom'. Not as nice a bike in my opinion. It'd have been better if they'd styled it more traditionally I reckon, rather than going for the US look. The GS850G was the big tourer in the range - it suffered from a bit of a weak clutch and from weighing about as much as Belgium - The later GS1000G was a much better proposition, with the clutch from the GSX1100, improved suspension and more power than the 850. The other reason for not buying the GS850 was the Yam XS850 - more go, better handling and a more characterful engine. But then maybe I'm biased...
Last edited by Hic! Mine's a triple (09-10-2008 18:34:17)
Offline
Well you live & learn as they say, very informative thread this & nostalgic at the same time.. As i say my know-how on what we've been talking about here goes about as far as owning a couple of X7's but i have to say the seat on them was much the same as the GSX, however a lot firmer (so firm the seat cover was prone to splitting) & for some daft reason it was the same level as the tank, so if you jammed the anchors on hard you'd slide off the seat, sliding onto the tank to clout your wedding veg on the fuel filler cap or worse, the top yoke! Probably accounts for the reason why so many X7's you see these days have cut seats where they have peeled back the seat cover & cut out some of the foam on the rider seat, some do it of course to make the bike a bit more like a proddy racer, but from experience that adding a bit of a recess in the seat to stop you skimming along the tank & singing soprano is certainly welcome for practical reasons.
Also knowing your point on the suspension, this is something the X7 also suffered with, hence why many X7's have the shock set with the spring at maximum stiffness (as you would for pillion or load carrying) at the back (also means the back of the bike sits a tad higher so we are back to the seat vs gonads problem as theseat then sloped downwards all the more) usually because at the back end it felt more like a bucking bronco ride, or they have swapped the original genuine shocks for aftermarket "get you through an MOT" R&R shocks which despite the fact they were a pile of turd, they seemed the best compromise.
Again like you say, the XS is the better bike over the GS & you say you are biased, one thing i will say is the same could be said for the X7's.. many people always said i should of had an X5 as they were more sporty or bought an "Elsie"(RD250LC/350LC) or the RD250DX instead if i wanted teh same sort of styling. OK i admit the X7 had it's faults (shock bushes failing regularly, head & exhaust gaskets often failed, it smoked like Dot Cotton) & the LC in comparison was a very scary bike as it was a pure wheelie machine for boy racers, but the X7 had a lot more character & above all it could be used as a tourer or to let your hair down for a good thrash up the cat & fiddle on a sunday afternoon & when i was 19 i prefered something i could use everyday to get to work/college on & not be out of place to much if i went to have a play on at weekends, rather than something that liked it's neck wrung. It's like the argument many bikers have today, where many say they had more fun running around on an old clapped out FS1E at 40mph trying to get it to the mythical 60mph mark or goind round on a ratter of a 125 that was governed down to 60mph than riding some modern road rocket that goes umpteen million miles an hour.
Offline
Very interesting postings from Hic & Wolfie (oooh it brings back the good old days) I can remember being a 16 year old two stroke jockey in wait for it (1976) my good old FSIE took me everywhere and i remember doing barrel and piston changes on the side of the road (wouldnt dream of it now would rather call the man with the van and have it carted off). Anyway it also brings me back to the GS1000G that Hic mentioned. I remember buying mine brand new in 1982 and covering over 60K on it with no problems apart from tyres, routine servicing etc. The most memorable part about the relationship was selling it some 20 years later for more than I paid for it, don't think i would be able to do that now? another good thing that Mrs Saftey used to ride pillion on that one, in many respects I wish I had not sold it and kept it in storage for a Sunday toy.
Anyway I can honestly say that I had more fun on old 'cheap' bikes than any new modern expensive machinery (or is that just me getting older).........
Offline
Yes, the big GS range were excellent pillion bikes - a mate of mine had a 1000G and I fell asleep on the back coming up the M6 one night... Perfectly fine, it was the most secure feeling pillion perch I ever sat on. On Wolfie's point about Suzi seats, the GSX250's had a softly padded kick-up at the front which climbed halfway up the back of the tank. Actually, another good pillion bike, too.
Offline